The Elephants in
the Room
by
Kenny A. Chaffin
All Rights Reserved © 2013 Kenny A. Chaffin
Maybe I’m getting crabby or
frustrated or impatient but it seems that physics has forgotten its basics.
Let’s start with gravity. We become aware of gravity even before we are born
and even more when we begin to make our way in the world, rolling, crawling and
walking. We are constantly aware of the ‘pull’ of gravity. Examination of
gravity rationally and scientifically began with Galileo (though certainly many
had thought about it before). He was the first we know of to conduct and record
experiments to determine the force of gravity and he supposedly tested dropping
balls from the Leaning Tower of Pisa though the majority of his experiments were
done using inclined planes and rolling balls. He was able to determine that the
acceleration of gravity was constant.
Now let’s jump to Newton. He took
our knowledge a step further, to actually mathematically determine the pull of
gravity and to show that its action was the same on Earth as in space by describing
mathematically how planets and stars interacted. Still he was at a loss as to
what the force actually was and how it worked.
Einstein took another giant leap by
equating gravity and acceleration and ultimately describing gravity as not a
force, but as a curvature of space due to mass. This theory predicted that
light would be ‘bent’ when passing near a massive object. We’ve actually seen
and measured this as well as observing the effects of gravitational lensing
wherein galaxies bend the light of stars around themselves.
Quantum mechanics has another
approach. According to the Standard Model there should be a particle – a
gravitron – that mediates the gravitational force (note that gravity is a force
here not curved space) which appears to be a direct contradiction with
Einstein’s General Relativity and its description of curved space.
String theory attempts to take a
slightly different angle in an attempt to move beyond quantum mechanics by
adding dimensions to space and ultimately trying to define quantum loop gravity
(in an attempt to unify relativity and quantum mechanics) as something like a
‘hidden’ dimension of reality. String theory has become extremely
mathematically intensive and has yet to meet the true standards of prediction
and testability required by science.
Now maybe this gravity issue is
just an ‘unanswered’ question of physics. Certainly that is what it seems to be
given the contradictory explanations between Relativity and Quantum. But hold
this in mind for a bit.
In Special Relativity Einstein
‘set’ the speed of light as constant and invariant due to various properties
that physicists had observed – primarily the Michelson-Morley experiment. He
pushed this idea further than anyone and developed his Special Theory of
Relativity (prior to the General Theory) with its unique results and
predictions about light, its behavior and ultimately about time changing
depending on the observers position and movement due to the fact that the speed
of light must always be invariant regardless of the motion of the observer.
This results in some very non-intuitive results, including the ability to (in a
manner of speaking) travel into the future. It all seems to be true based on
tests conducted with clocks of various types moving at various speeds. The
question for me though is why is the speed of light constant and why if photons
are massless do they have a finite speed? This is the elephant in the room as
is the curvature of space.
Now maybe as opposed to Marvin the
Android my tiny brain just can’t comprehend these concepts, but it seems
something is missing. It seems that perhaps we need to slow down, back up and
rethink. That is a bit what the bad boy of physics Lee Smolin is attempting to
do in his approach. He worked for decades in researching and developing String
Theory before declaring it the wrong approach. This is detailed in his book
“The Trouble with Physics” and continues in his latest release “Time Reborn.”
In it he revisits the fundamentals of physics including light, space and time.
He has taken the radical approach of declaring Time the fundamental component
of reality. In essence he is setting time as real and invariant similarly to
what Einstein did with the speed of light. At one point in the book he states that
this approach is really just another way of looking at Relativity.
After reading about Special and
General Relativity myself for decades (but without any of the mathematical
abilities to examine it in detail) I’ve often wondered myself about whether one
could simply choose a component of reality as we know it – like the speed of
light, time, or space – set it as invariant and work the math required to
develop an alternative view of reality just as Einstein did. Now Smolin’s book
and view on time is written for the popular reader and he admits that he has
not followed through with the mathematics but is putting the idea forward as an
alternative possibility in the hopes of someone taking it and running with it.
Along these same lines now comes
Dark Matter and Dark Energy to explain a couple of anomalies we seem to observe
in the cosmos. Dark Matter is the proposed solution for the aberrant movement
of galaxies and stars which appear to be acting as though there were more mass
in the universe than is evident from the stars and reflected light we see. It certainly
seems possible there is ‘unseen’ matter that might cause this gravitational
effect. Another possibility could be that our observation is somehow affected
by space or time or other laws of the universe we simply don’t understand yet.
This brings us to Dark Energy, the
proposed solution to the recently discovered accelerated expansion of the
universe. We’ve known (or assumed we have) that the universe is expanding since
Hubble measured and proposed it in 1929. We can measure the red-shift of
distant stars with spectrographic instruments and have determined that not only
are they all moving away from us (thus implying expansion) but that that
expansion is accelerating. This has been confirmed by recent cosmic microwave
background measurements. We don’t know why this is happening yet Dark Energy
has been anointed as the reason by creating a kind of anti-gravity force
‘pushing’ space apart while at the same time being a force that is
undetectable, unmeasurable, and invisible other than through the observation of
the foresaid acceleration of universal expansion.
I don’t know about you gentle
reader, but this is all a bit unsettling for me. There are many unknowns here
and of course as Feynman says that’s okay, it is much better for science to say
I don’t know than to create unsupportable, unsubstantiated solutions. I
‘believe’ in science, I trust it to eventually find the answers to the reality
of the universe around us but at times I wonder if perhaps we haven’t gotten
off the path, I wonder if perhaps we are not seeing the elephants in the room
and if perhaps we should not stop, regroup, and reexamine some of our basic
assumptions about the world around us.
About the Author
Kenny A. Chaffin writes
poetry, fiction and nonfiction and has published poems and fiction in Vision Magazine, The Bay Review, Caney
River Reader, WritersHood, Star*Line, MiPo, Melange and Ad Astra and
has published nonfiction in The
Writer, The Electron, Writers Journal and Today’s Family. He grew up in
southern Oklahoma and now lives in Denver, CO where he works hard to make
enough of a living to support two cats, numerous wild birds and a bevy of
squirrels. His poetry collections No
Longer Dressed in Black, The
Poet of Utah Park, The Joy of Science, A Fleeting Existence, a collection of science essays How do we Know, and a memoir of growing up on an Oklahoma farm - Growing
Up Stories are all available at Amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B007S3SMY8. He
may be contacted through his website at http://www.kacweb.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment